Cited commercial intelligence for your specific markets, where the next decision is made.

You've probably tried it already. ChatGPT gives you a well-written summary, but you can't present it to your VP because nothing is cited, companies aren't ranked, and the market size comes from somewhere you can't trace.

ChatGPT and other AI models are built for everyone. They capture the top pages of search results and repackage them into generic overviews. One market size number with no source. Companies mentioned but not ranked.

Enki is built for market analysts, intelligence, and BD professionals. It follows a market intelligence workflow: ranked competitive landscapes, cited cost comparisons, regulation-to-commercial-impact analysis, thesis validation with counter-arguments.

Before a brief reaches you, Enki cross-verifies claims against filings and disclosures, ranks sources by credibility not search position, normalizes cost data across sources with different assumptions, separates PR announcements from commercial activity, and tracks whether a pilot actually progressed or quietly disappeared.

You can present an Enki brief to leadership. You cannot present a ChatGPT response.

No. You'll keep using both.

BNEF, Rystad, Wood Mackenzie, and McKinsey cover mature markets at the macro level. Hydrogen as a category. Solar as an industry. Carbon capture as a sector. They do this well because the market is large enough to justify the investment in coverage.

Your decisions don't live at the macro level. They live at the intersection: SOFC in maritime, DAC in defense, ammonia bunkering in Northern Europe, liquid cooling for AI data centers. No macro platform covers these because the market is too early, too specific, or sits at a cross-section no one has found profitable to map.

Enki covers the gap they leave open. Most teams use their macro subscription for the broad view and Enki for the specific product line where the next decision is made.

Every source you'd check manually, but at a scale you can't match. Company disclosures, patent filings, grant announcements, regulatory filings, press releases, trade publications, academic papers, and government databases.

Not all sources are equal. Enki ranks them by credibility. A SEC filing outranks a blog post. A company's annual report outranks a news article about that company. A government grant database outranks a press release about the grant. The source hierarchy is built in, not left to you to sort out.

Every claim in your brief links back to its source. Your team can click through and verify any number before presenting it.

Every number traces to its source. Click any figure in your brief and you see where it came from.

When sources disagree, Enki doesn't pick one and hide the rest. It shows the range and explains why the numbers differ. One source reports $4,500/kW. Another says $2,800/kW. Both might be correct for different configurations, scales, or assumptions. Enki surfaces that, so you present the range with confidence instead of guessing which number is right.

Enki scans sources continuously. Every brief reflects the latest available information at the time you ask. Not last quarter's report. Not a database updated annually.

You can filter by time: last week, last month, last six months. If a partnership was announced three days ago, it shows up. If a regulation changed yesterday, it's in your brief.

That's where Enki is strongest. SOFC in maritime. DAC in defense. Waste heat recovery in Canada. Ammonia bunkering in Northern Europe. These are real briefs Enki has produced.

The more specific your question, the more valuable Brief becomes. Macro platforms can't go there because the market isn't large enough to justify coverage. Enki can, because it assembles the brief on demand from primary sources instead of maintaining a pre-built database.

Every claim in an Enki brief is tied to a source. If the source doesn't exist, the claim doesn't appear. That's the structural difference between Enki and a general LLM.

Enki also cross-verifies claims across sources. If only one blog post makes a claim and no filing or disclosure supports it, it gets flagged or excluded. When Enki doesn't have enough evidence, it says so rather than filling the gap with generated text.

No. Enki replaces the 15 open tabs and the evening spent stitching them together. Your analysts still bring the domain expertise, the judgment, and the relationships no tool can replicate.

What changes is how they spend their time. Instead of assembling the raw material from scattered sources, they start with a cited, structured brief and spend their time on analysis, interpretation, and recommendations. The work that actually requires their expertise.

Yes. Click share and send a direct link. Export the sources behind any chart or table into a spreadsheet. Or generate a presentation and share the deck. Every citation and source link stays intact.

Enki starts at $200 a year. No setup fees. No contracts. Cancel anytime.

You get a free week to test it on your own market. Ask any question, generate real briefs, share them with your team. No limits during the trial. If it doesn't fit your workflow, cancel before the week ends and you pay nothing.