Baker Hughes Geothermal Strategy 2025: How 800 MW in New Deals Signals a Market Tipping Point

Industry Adoption: How Baker Hughes is Driving Geothermal from Niche to Mainstream

Between 2021 and 2024, Baker Hughes methodically laid the groundwork for its geothermal pivot, moving from a legacy oilfield service provider to a dedicated energy transition technologist. This foundational period was characterized by strategic ecosystem-building, including R&D initiatives like the Wells2Watts consortium to test well repurposing, targeted investments in innovators like GreenFire Energy, and the launch of specialized hardware such as Vulcanix™ drill bits. The strategy was one of preparation: building a comprehensive toolkit and forming exploratory partnerships with national oil companies like SOCAR and Ecopetrol to assess new markets. The key metric was potential, demonstrated by a record $750 million in “new energy” orders in 2023, signaling growing commercial interest.

The year 2025 marks a dramatic inflection point where preparation has converted into market dominance. The strategy has shifted from building a toolkit to deploying it at a utility scale. In 2025 alone, Baker Hughes secured definitive agreements for a massive 800 MW of geothermal power through two landmark U.S. projects: the 500 MW Hell’s Kitchen project with Controlled Thermal Resources (CTR) and the 300 MW Cape Station Phase II project with Fervo Energy. This shift is not just in scale but in market application; these projects are explicitly aimed at meeting the surging, high-value energy demand from data centers and AI. Furthermore, achieving “Awardable” status from the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) opens an entirely new vertical focused on energy security for military bases, a non-cyclical, high-priority market. The adoption of Baker Hughes’ geothermal solutions has evolved from niche pilots to becoming a critical enabler of large-scale, baseload renewable power for the most demanding sectors of the modern economy.

Table: Baker Hughes Geothermal Investment and Capital Commitments

Table: Baker Hughes Strategic Geothermal Partnerships

Geography: How Baker Hughes is Balancing Global Exploration with U.S. Execution

Baker Hughes’ geographic strategy shows a distinct evolution from broad exploration to focused execution. Between 2021 and 2024, the company cast a wide net, establishing partnerships to assess nascent geothermal potential in diverse regions, including Colombia (Ecopetrol), Azerbaijan (SOCAR), Australia (Earths Energy), and the UK/Ireland (Causeway GT). This phase was about planting flags and using its technical expertise to unlock new markets and de-risk early-stage exploration for its partners. The primary focus was on market entry and resource evaluation rather than immediate large-scale development.

In 2025, the map consolidated dramatically around the United States as the primary theater for commercial execution. The landmark deals with CTR in California (500 MW) and Fervo Energy in Utah (300 MW) demonstrate that the U.S. is the clear leader for deploying utility-scale geothermal projects, driven by mature regulatory frameworks, project-ready developers, and clear market demand from data centers. While the U.S. is the epicenter of execution, the company maintains its global ambition. The “Awardable” status from the DoD creates a worldwide mandate to develop projects on military bases, while partnerships in Ukraine (Nadra) and the UK (Eden Geothermal) signal a continued, albeit longer-term, focus on European markets. This tells us that while geothermal is becoming mainstream in the U.S., Baker Hughes is positioning itself to replicate this success globally as other regions mature.

Technology Maturity: How Baker Hughes Shifted from Development to Deployment

The 2021–2024 period was defined by technology development and validation at the component and pilot level. Baker Hughes focused on building out its geothermal-specific portfolio, launching products like the ThermaStim™ stimulation system and Vulcanix™ drill bits, engineered for harsh geothermal conditions. The creation of the Wells2Watts consortium in Oklahoma City to test technologies like GreenFire Energy’s closed-loop system was a critical step in proving the feasibility of emerging concepts in a controlled environment. The technology strategy was about innovating and de-risking individual pieces of the geothermal puzzle, from drilling to well integrity, to prepare for commercial primetime.

By 2025, the narrative has shifted from developing components to delivering integrated, commercial-scale systems. The company is no longer just selling drill bits; it is providing comprehensive project solutions. The contracts for the Hell’s Kitchen and Cape Station projects validate this integrated approach, which combines high-temperature drilling, the world’s largest installed base of geothermal Electric Submersible Pumps (ESPs), and proprietary Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) power plant systems. The delivery of five 60 MW ORC units for the Cape Station project is a key validation point, proving the company can manufacture and deploy surface power generation equipment at scale. The GaffneyCline advisory service ties this all together, offering a de-risked workflow from subsurface to surface. The technology has matured from being tested in a single well in Oklahoma to being the backbone of multi-hundred-megawatt power projects, signaling its readiness for mass-market scaling.

Table: SWOT Analysis of Baker Hughes’ Geothermal Strategy

Forward-Looking Insights: From Securing Deals to Delivering Watts

The data from 2025 sends an unequivocal signal: Baker Hughes has successfully transitioned from a company preparing for the geothermal boom to one that is actively leading it. The coming year will be defined by execution. Market actors should closely watch for progress on the 500 MW Hell’s Kitchen and 300 MW Cape Station projects, as any milestones—or delays—will serve as a bellwether for the entire next-generation geothermal industry. Another critical signal will be the conversion of the “Awardable” status with the U.S. DoD into the first concrete project award, which would cement a new, stable revenue stream in the energy security sector.

While U.S. execution takes center stage, progress on international collaborations, particularly in the UK and Ukraine, will indicate the replicability of its model in different regulatory and geological environments. Finally, expect key technology announcements to emerge from the expanded R&D facilities in Italy, likely focused on driving down the levelized cost of energy by improving turbine efficiency and further optimizing drilling technologies. The momentum has shifted from partnership announcements to project backlogs. The key question is no longer if Baker Hughes can win in geothermal, but how quickly it can deliver on its 800 MW pipeline and expand it further.

To track these developments and analyze how players like Baker Hughes are reshaping the energy landscape, leading firms use Enki. Request a demo to see how our platform can power your competitive intelligence and strategic decision-making.

Frequently Asked Questions

What makes the 800 MW of new deals in 2025 so significant for Baker Hughes?
The 800 MW of new deals in 2025 is significant because it marks a major inflection point where years of preparation have converted into market dominance. It signals a shift from small-scale pilots and R&D to deploying geothermal energy at a massive utility scale, validating geothermal as a mainstream, baseload renewable power source for demanding sectors like data centers.

How did Baker Hughes’ strategy change between the 2021-2024 period and 2025?
Between 2021 and 2024, the strategy was focused on preparation: building a technology toolkit (like Vulcanix™ drill bits), investing in innovators, and forming exploratory partnerships. In 2025, the strategy shifted dramatically to execution and deployment at scale, as demonstrated by the definitive agreements for the Hell’s Kitchen and Cape Station projects.

Who are the new customers or markets for the power from these large geothermal projects?
The power from these new, large-scale geothermal projects is explicitly aimed at two high-value markets. The first is the technology sector, specifically meeting the surging energy demand from data centers and AI. The second is a new government vertical, the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD), which requires geothermal for energy security at military bases.

While the big projects are in the U.S., is Baker Hughes still active internationally?
Yes. While the U.S. is the clear center for large-scale execution in 2025, Baker Hughes maintains its global ambitions. The company signed a cooperation agreement in Ukraine with Nadra, an agreement in the UK with Eden Geothermal, and its “Awardable” status with the U.S. DoD gives it a mandate to develop projects on military bases globally, not just in the U.S.

According to the SWOT analysis, what is the biggest risk for Baker Hughes’ geothermal business now?
The biggest risk has shifted from strategic to operational. Previously, the risk was whether the company’s geothermal pivot would work at all. Now, with 800 MW in major contracts secured, the primary risk is execution. The company’s success and reputation in the sector now depend on its ability to deliver the massive and complex Hell’s Kitchen and Cape Station projects without significant delays or cost overruns.