Shell Hydrogen Initiatives for 2025: Key Projects, Strategies and Partnerships

Shell’s Hydrogen Pivot: From Broad Bets to a Focused Industrial Strategy

Industry Adoption: A Strategic Sharpening Towards Industrial Scale

Between 2021 and 2024, Shell’s hydrogen strategy was characterized by broad exploration across the technology stack and value chain. The company pursued both blue hydrogen, with its proprietary Shell Blue Hydrogen Process, and green hydrogen, initiating large-scale projects like Holland Hydrogen I and REFHYNE II. Its application focus was diverse, spanning industrial feedstock, research into marine engine use, and a direct-to-consumer play with light-duty vehicle fueling stations in California. This “all of the above” approach reflected an industry-wide effort to identify viable market segments. However, this period also revealed commercial headwinds, culminating in the 2024 closure of its California hydrogen fueling network, signaling a strategic retreat from the passenger vehicle market.

The period from 2025 onward marks a significant inflection point. Shell has pivoted away from broad exploration toward a concentrated strategy focused on large-scale, industrial green hydrogen. The impending launch of the 200 MW Holland Hydrogen 1 plant in Rotterdam is the cornerstone of this shift, moving from construction to tangible production. The application focus has sharpened accordingly, targeting industrial decarbonization and the creation of new energy products. Partnerships with HIF Global and Porsche for e-Gasoline supply and an alliance with Technip Energies to deploy the CANSOLV CO2 Capture System underscore a new emphasis on integrating hydrogen and related technologies into existing heavy industry and mobility value chains. This shift from consumer-facing pilots to industrial-scale production and offtake agreements indicates a maturation in strategy, targeting sectors where hydrogen presents a clearer, more economically viable decarbonization pathway. The new opportunity lies in creating integrated ecosystems, while the threat remains the pace of industrial customer adoption and cost-competitiveness.

Investment: Fueling the Industrial Hydrogen Engine

Shell’s investment patterns mirror its strategic pivot from broad low-carbon initiatives to a more focused, technology-driven hydrogen play. Earlier investments established a renewable energy foundation, while recent funding rounds target next-generation technologies essential for scaling the green hydrogen economy efficiently and cost-effectively. The co-led investment in Supercritical’s ultra-efficient electrolysers and the significant capital allocation towards green hydrogen within its broader low-carbon budget highlight a clear commitment to technological leadership and cost reduction in the hydrogen sector.

Table: Shell’s Strategic Investments in Low-Carbon and Hydrogen Technologies

Partnerships: Building Ecosystems, Not Just Projects

Shell’s collaboration strategy has evolved from technology exploration to market creation. The partnerships formed between 2021 and 2024 focused heavily on testing and developing different electrolyser technologies (Bloom, Verdagy, Ohmium) and exploring new use cases (ZeroAvia for aviation). However, recent partnerships in 2025 reveal a more integrated approach. Collaborations with DEWA in Dubai, Technip Energies for CO2 capture, and HIF Global/Porsche for e-fuels are aimed at building complete value chains—from production to end-use. The cancellation of the Equinor megaprojects and the Aukra blue hydrogen project in Norway due to insufficient demand highlights a critical lesson: successful scaling requires not just technological readiness but secured offtake and a supportive commercial ecosystem.

Table: Shell’s Evolving Hydrogen Partnership Landscape

Geography: Consolidating in Industrial Hubs

Shell’s geographic footprint for hydrogen has evolved from a scattered global presence to a concentrated focus on strategic industrial hubs. The 2021-2024 period saw activities across North America (California fueling stations, Canadian CCS), Europe (Netherlands, Germany), and Asia (China electrolyser, India partnership). This widespread activity was indicative of a search for favorable policy and market conditions.

From 2025, the map shows a clear consolidation. Europe, particularly the Port of Rotterdam (Holland Hydrogen 1) and Germany’s Rheinland industrial park (REFHYNE II), has become the epicenter of Shell’s large-scale green hydrogen production efforts. This region offers a potent combination of renewable energy access, dense industrial demand, and supportive infrastructure policy (e.g., TenneT grid connection). Simultaneously, the Middle East has emerged as a key growth region, evidenced by the green hydrogen refueling station in Oman and the strategic partnership with DEWA in Dubai. This signals a move towards regions with excellent solar resources and ambitions to become global clean energy exporters. The pullback from US light-duty retail and the cancelled Norwegian project suggest a strategic reallocation of capital to locations where industrial integration and scale are most achievable.

Technology Maturity: From Pilot to Production and Next-Gen Efficiency

The technological maturity of Shell’s hydrogen portfolio has advanced significantly, moving from demonstration to commercial-scale deployment and investment in next-generation systems.

In the 2021-2024 period, Shell operated a mix of mature and pilot-stage technologies. The Shell Blue Hydrogen Process was a commercially available technology, while large-scale PEM electrolysis projects like Holland Hydrogen I and REFHYNE II were in the final investment decision (FID) and construction phases—effectively large-scale pilots of an integrated system. Exploratory work, such as using hydrogen in diesel engines, remained in the early research stage. The closure of its light-duty fueling stations represented the commercial failure of a specific application, not the underlying technology.

The 2025 data shows a clear progression. The imminent operational launch of Holland Hydrogen 1 moves a 200 MW green hydrogen asset from the pilot/construction phase to commercial production. The successful first hydrogen production from the megawatt-scale SOEC demonstrator with Ceres Power validates a key high-efficiency technology pathway. Furthermore, Shell is actively investing in what comes next. The Series A funding for Supercritical’s ultra-efficient, membrane-less electrolyser technology and the successful demonstration of a commercial-scale liquid hydrogen storage tank concept with CB&I and NASA are crucial validation points. This shows a dual strategy: commercializing current-generation technology at scale while simultaneously funding and de-risking the next wave of innovations needed to lower costs and enable global trade.

Table: Shell Hydrogen SWOT Analysis

Forward-Looking Insights: The Year of Operational Excellence and Integration

The data from 2025 signals that Shell is moving into a new phase of its hydrogen journey. The year ahead will be less about announcing new megaprojects and more about execution, optimization, and integration. The primary signal to watch is the operational performance of Holland Hydrogen 1. Its production volumes, efficiency, and uptime will be a critical benchmark for the entire European green hydrogen industry. We should expect Shell to leverage its CANSOLV technology partnership with Technip Energies to offer integrated decarbonization solutions for industrial clients, combining green hydrogen with carbon capture.

Investment is likely to continue flowing towards technologies that promise lower production costs, such as the advanced electrolysers developed by Supercritical and Ceres Power. The successful liquid hydrogen storage demonstration points to a growing focus on building the logistical backbone for a traded hydrogen market. The key trend gaining traction is the creation of closed-loop ecosystems with guaranteed offtake, as seen in the Porsche e-fuels deal. Conversely, standalone hydrogen production projects without clear buyers are losing steam, as evidenced by the cancelled Norwegian venture. For market actors, the message is clear: the era of speculative hydrogen bets is giving way to a more disciplined, value-chain-oriented approach where operational excellence and secured demand are paramount.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why has Shell’s hydrogen strategy changed since 2024?
Shell’s strategy shifted from a broad, exploratory approach across all applications to a focused strategy on large-scale, industrial green hydrogen. This pivot was driven by commercial realities, such as the closure of its California passenger vehicle fueling stations, which highlighted that heavy industry and related value chains offer a clearer, more economically viable path to decarbonization.

What is the main focus of Shell’s current hydrogen strategy?
The current focus is on industrial decarbonization. Shell is concentrating on large-scale green hydrogen production, exemplified by its 200 MW Holland Hydrogen 1 plant, to supply heavy industry and create new energy products like e-fuels through partnerships with companies like Porsche and HIF Global. The goal is to build integrated ecosystems with secured demand.

Why did Shell close its hydrogen fueling stations in California?
Shell closed its California fueling network in 2024 due to what the article describes as “commercial headwinds.” This move signaled a strategic retreat from the light-duty passenger vehicle market, as it proved to be a segment with unproven demand, prompting Shell to focus its resources on more promising industrial applications.

How are Shell’s investments supporting its new industrial focus?
Shell’s investments now target technologies that can scale the green hydrogen economy efficiently and reduce costs. For example, Shell Ventures co-led a funding round for Supercritical, a startup developing ultra-efficient electrolysers. This, combined with a committed annual spend of up to $1 billion on hydrogen and CCS, shows a clear focus on technological leadership for industrial-scale production.

What do the cancelled projects in Norway tell us about Shell’s strategy?
The cancellation of the Aukra blue hydrogen project and other European megaprojects with Equinor highlights a critical lesson learned by Shell: technological readiness is not enough. These projects were halted due to a lack of sufficient market demand and secured buyers (offtake). This reinforces Shell’s strategic pivot towards projects with integrated value chains and guaranteed customers, rather than speculative production.

Want strategic insights like this on your target company or market?

Build clean tech reports in minutes — not days — with real data on partnerships, commercial activities, sustainability strategies, and emerging trends.